Now it really handles noise especially in dark areas much better. Not mentioned by Ian in the video is the new DxO “DeepPRIME XD” support for X-Trans files, which is clearly superior to the more basic “DeepPRIME”. And it’s up to everyone to decide how to do that.īut if you own X-Trans cameras and use Lightroom, then using DxO as a plug-in is definitely a recommended step to take into your post processing workflow. Look, RAW files are intended to be processed. Price Comparison of all the Gear in this Article.It is a perfect balance of incredible image quality (at low and high ISOs) and additional features that pros might want such as autofocus for wildlife & action, or dual card slots if landscapes are just your hobby and you actually do portraits. Not bad for the Fujifilm combo, which costs about half as much as the Canon combo. The Nikon D750 is one of the best full-frame adventure, travel, landscape etc. But overall, both delivered absolutely excellent results. Sometimes in certain areas he preferred the details on the X-H2, sometimes on the R5. The result: the Fujifilm X-H2 and the Canon R5 both delivered very comparable results. Well, he did the same with Canon files, but DxO did not bring any benefits in terms of sharpness to the Canon files, as opposed to Fujifilm X-Trans files, which definitely saw an improvement if passed through the DxO engine. Nope, he wanted to “help” Lightroom to deal with X-Trans files, and hence used DxO Pure RAW to transform the files into a DNG and only then processed them in Lightroom. He did not simply load the files into Lightroom to process the RAW files (with Lightroom standard settings) and then print the images.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |